Central-to-peripheral blood pressure amplification: role of the recording site, technology, analysis approach, and calibration scheme in invasive and non-invasive data agreement.

Background: Systolic blood pressure amplification (SBPA) and pulse pressure amplification (PPA) can independently predict cardiovascular damage and mortality. A wide range of methods are used for the non-invasive estimation of SBPA and PPA. The most accurate non-invasive method for obtaining SBPA and/or PPA remains unknown. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the agreement between the SBPA and PPA values that are invasively and non-invasively obtained using different (1) measurement sites (radial, brachial, carotid), (2) measuring techniques (tonometry, oscillometry/plethysmography, ultrasound), (3) pulse waveform analysis approaches, and (4) calibration methods [systo-diastolic vs. approaches using brachial diastolic and mean blood pressure (BP)], with the latter calculated using different equations or measured by oscillometry. Methods: Invasive aortic and brachial pressure (catheterism) and non-invasive aortic and peripheral (brachial, radial) BP were simultaneously obtained from 34 subjects using different methodologies, analysis methods, measuring sites, and calibration methods. SBPA and PPA were quantified. Concordance correlation and the Bland-Altman analysis were performed. Results: (1) In general, SBPA and PPA levels obtained with non-invasive approaches were not associated with those recorded invasively. (2) The different non-invasive approaches led to (extremely) dissimilar results. In general, non-invasive measurements underestimated SBPA and PPA; the higher the invasive SBPA (or PPA), the greater the underestimation. (3) None of the calibration schemes, which considered non-invasive brachial BP to estimate SBPA or PPA, were better than the others. (4) SBPA and PPA levels obtained from radial artery waveform analysis (tonometry) (5) and common carotid artery ultrasound recordings and brachial artery waveform analysis, respectively, minimized the mean errors. Conclusions: Overall, the findings showed that (i) SBPA and PPA indices are not "synonymous" and (ii) non-invasive approaches would fail to accurately determine invasive SBPA or PPA levels, regardless of the recording site, analysis, and calibration methods. Non-invasive measurements generally underestimated SBPA and PPA, and the higher the invasive SBPA or PPA, the higher the underestimation. There was not a calibration scheme better than the others. Consequently, our study emphasizes the strong need to be critical of measurement techniques, to have methodological transparency, and to have expert consensus for non-invasive assessment of SBPA and PPA.

Presencia de regurgitación moderada o grave luego del implante percutáneo de la válvula aórtica con la estrategia de "Cusp Overlap" / Presence of Moderate or Severe Regurgitation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant with the Cusp Overlap Strategy

RESUMEN Objetivo : Analizar si la estrategia del implante alto usando superposición de las cúspides derechas e izquierdas (Cusp Overlap, COVL) en el implante percutáneo de la válvula aórtica (TAVI) se relaciona con menor incidencia de regurgitación paravalvular (RPV) moderada o grave, comparada con la estrategia convencional (CON). Material y métodos : Se analizaron 206 pacientes consecutivos que recibieron TAVI con válvulas autoexpandidles entre agosto de 2019 y mayo de 2022. Se utilizó una estrategia CON en 101 pacientes (49%) y COVL en 105 (51%). El Punto Final Primario (PFP) fue la presencia de regurgitación paravalvular moderada y grave a 30 días. Resultados : No hubo diferencia clínica entre los grupos en cuanto a la edad media, sexo ni comorbilidades; excepto una tendencia a más diabetes y angioplastia coronaria previa en el grupo COVL. El STS score fue mayor en el grupo de COVL (6,9 ± 2,2 vs. 5,8 ± 2,4 en CON, p = 0,01). A 30 días no hubo diferencia en el PFP (RPV moderada en 2% en CON, y 0,9% en COVL; ninguno presentó RPV grave). Tampoco hubo diferencia en mortalidad, infarto, oclusión coronaria, accidente cerebrovascular, sangrado mayor y complicación vascular. La necesidad de marcapasos definitivo fue menor con la estrategia de COVL (6,7% vs. 17,8%, p = 0,01) y un nuevo bloqueo de rama izquierda ocurrió en 5,7% vs. 12,9% (p = 0,07). Conclusiones : En esta serie de un solo centro, la estrategia del implante alto de la válvula aórtica percutánea usando la técnica de COVL no demostró diferencia en la presencia de regurgitaciones moderadas o graves comparada con la estrategia convencional, sin presentar diferencia en las complicaciones, y se asoció a una menor necesidad de marcapasos definitivo y a una tendencia de menos bloqueos de rama izquierda a 30 días.

ABSTRACT Objective : The aim of this study is to whether higher transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with self-expandable valves using the right and left cusp overlap strategy (Cusp Overlap, COVL) is associated with a lower incidence of moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation, compared with the conventional strategy (CON). Methods : A total of 206 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI with self-expandable valves between August 2019 and May 2022 were analyzed. The CON technique was used in the first 101 patients (49%) and COVL was used in 105 (51%). The primary endpoint (PEP) was the presence of moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation at 30 days. Results : There were no clinical differences between the groups in terms of mean age, sex or comorbidities, except for a trend towards more patients with diabetes and previous percutaneous coronary intervention in the COVL group. The STS score was greater in the COVL group (6.9 ± 2.2 vs. 5.8 ± 2.4 in the CON group; p = 0.01). There was no difference in the PEP at 30 days with 2% incidence of moderate PVR in the CON group and 0.9% in the COVL group, and none of them presented severe PVR. There were no differences in mortality, myocardial infarction, coronary artery obstruction, stroke, major bleeding or vascular complications. The need for permanent pacemaker was lower with the COVL strategy (6.7% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.01) and a new left bundle branch block occurred in 5.7% vs. 12.9% (p = 0.07). Conclusions : In this single-center series, the strategy of high transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the COVL strategy showed no difference in the presence of moderate or severe regurgitation compared with the conventional strategy, with no differences in complications, and was associated with a lower need for definitive pacemaker and with a trend towards lower incidence of left bundle branch block at 30 days.

Aortic systolic and pulse pressure invasively and non-invasively obtained: Comparative analysis of recording techniques, arterial sites of measurement, waveform analysis algorithms and calibration methods.

Background: The non-invasive estimation of aortic systolic (aoSBP) and pulse pressure (aoPP) is achieved by a great variety of devices, which differ markedly in the: 1) principles of recording (applied technology), 2) arterial recording site, 3) model and mathematical analysis applied to signals, and/or 4) calibration scheme. The most reliable non-invasive procedure to obtain aoSBP and aoPP is not well established. Aim: To evaluate the agreement between aoSBP and aoPP values invasively and non-invasively obtained using different: 1) recording techniques (tonometry, oscilometry/plethysmography, ultrasound), 2) recording sites [radial, brachial (BA) and carotid artery (CCA)], 3) waveform analysis algorithms (e.g., direct analysis of the CCA pulse waveform vs. peripheral waveform analysis using general transfer functions, N-point moving average filters, etc.), 4) calibration schemes (systolic-diastolic calibration vs. methods using BA diastolic and mean blood pressure (bMBP); the latter calculated using different equations vs. measured directly by oscillometry, and 5) different equations to estimate bMBP (i.e., using a form factor of 33% ("033"), 41.2% ("0412") or 33% corrected for heart rate ("033HR"). Methods: The invasive aortic (aoBP) and brachial pressure (bBP) (catheterization), and the non-invasive aoBP and bBP were simultaneously obtained in 34 subjects. Non-invasive aoBP levels were obtained using different techniques, analysis methods, recording sites, and calibration schemes. Results: 1) Overall, non-invasive approaches yielded lower aoSBP and aoPP levels than those recorded invasively. 2) aoSBP and aoPP determinations based on CCA recordings, followed by BA recordings, were those that yielded values closest to those recorded invasively. 3) The "033HR" and "0412" calibration schemes ensured the lowest mean error, and the "033" method determined aoBP levels furthest from those recorded invasively. 4) Most of the non-invasive approaches considered overestimated and underestimated aoSBP at low (i.e., 80 mmHg) and high (i.e., 180 mmHg) invasive aoSBP values, respectively. 5) The higher the invasively measured aoPP, the higher the level of underestimation provided by the non-invasive methods. Conclusion: The recording method and site, the mathematical method/model used to quantify aoSBP and aoPP, and to calibrate waveforms, are essential when estimating aoBP. Our study strongly emphasizes the need for methodological transparency and consensus for the non-invasive aoBP assessment.

Brachial Blood Pressure Invasively and Non-Invasively Obtained Using Oscillometry and Applanation Tonometry: Impact of Mean Blood Pressure Equations and Calibration Schemes on Agreement Levels.

The use of oscillometric methods to determine brachial blood pressure (bBP) can lead to a systematic underestimation of the invasively measured systolic (bSBP) and pulse (bPP) pressure levels, together with a significant overestimation of diastolic pressure (bDBP). Similarly, the agreement between brachial mean blood pressure (bMBP), invasively and non-invasively measured, can be affected by inaccurate estimations/assumptions. Despite several methodologies that can be applied to estimate bMBP non-invasively, there is no consensus on which approach leads to the most accurate estimation. Aims: to evaluate the association and agreement between: (1) non-invasive (oscillometry) and invasive bBP; (2) invasive bMBP, and bMBP (i) measured by oscillometry and (ii) calculated using six different equations; and (3) bSBP and bPP invasively and non-invasively obtained by applanation tonometry and employing different calibration methods. To this end, invasive aortic blood pressure and bBP (catheterization), and non-invasive bBP (oscillometry [Mobil-O-Graph] and brachial artery applanation tonometry [SphygmoCor]) were simultaneously obtained (34 subjects, 193 records). bMBP was calculated using different approaches. Results: (i) the agreement between invasive bBP and their respective non-invasive measurements (oscillometry) showed dependence on bBP levels (proportional error); (ii) among the different approaches used to obtain bMBP, the equation that includes a form factor equal to 33% (bMBP = bDBP + bPP/3) showed the best association with the invasive bMBP; (iii) the best approach to estimate invasive bSBP and bPP from tonometry recordings is based on the calibration scheme that employs oscillometric bMBP. On the contrary, the worst association between invasive and applanation tonometry-derived bBP levels was observed when the brachial pulse waveform was calibrated to bMBP quantified as bMBP = bDBP + bPP/3. Our study strongly emphasizes the need for methodological transparency and consensus for non-invasive bMBP assessment.

Implante alto de las válvulas autoexpandibles con la técnica de "Cusp-Overlap", una estrategia para disminuir la necesidad de marcapasos en el implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica. Evolución a 30 días / High Self-expandable Valve Implantation with the Cusp-Overlap Technique, a Strategy to Reduce the Need for Pacemaker in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. 30-day Outcome

RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar si el implante más alto en el implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica (TAVI) con válvulas auto-expandibles utilizando la superposición de las cúspides derecha e izquierda disminuye la necesidad de marcapasos definitivo. Material y Métodos: Se analizaron 164 pacientes consecutivos que recibieron TAVI con válvulas auto- expandibles; en 101(61,6%) de ellos se implantaron utilizando la vista coplanar de las tres cúspides, a la cual llamamos técnica convencional (CON) y en 63 (38,4%) utilizamos la técnica COVL, con superposición de las cúspides derecha e izquierda . El punto final primario (PFP) fue la necesidad de marcapasos definitivo (MCPD) a 30 días. Resultado: No hubo diferencias entre los grupos en la edad media, prevalencia de sexo masculino, hipertensión, cirugía de revascularización previa, antecedente de accidente cerebrovascular (ACV), función renal, o hemodiálisis. Los pacientes en el grupo COVL tuvieron más diabetes, angioplastia coronaria (ATC) e infarto previos. La ATC pre-TAVI fue similar, con mayor score STS (6,3 ± 2,1 vs. 5,8 ± 2,4; p = 0,05). La presencia de fibrilación auricular fue mayor en el grupo COVL sin diferencia en bloqueo auriculoventricular, de rama derecha o izquierda. No hubo diferencia en el área valvular aórtica, gradiente medio y fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda. A 30 días se observó una reducción significativa del PFP en la estrategia COVL, (6,3% vs 17,8%, p = 0,03). No hubo diferencia en mortalidad, ACV, sangrado mayor, infarto agudo de miocardio o regurgitación aórtica. Hubo tendencia a menor presencia de nuevo bloqueo competo de rama izquierda en el grupo COVL (4,8% vs. 12,9%, p = 0,08). Conclusiones: El uso de la técnica de COVL, que permite un implante más alto en el TAVI con válvulas autoexpandibles, demostró en esta serie ser factible y seguro, con disminución de la necesidad de MCPD sin aumento de las complicaciones.

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze whether higher transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self-expandable valves using the right and left cusp overlap strategy decreases the need for permanent pacemaker. Methods: A total of 164 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI with self-expandable valves were analyzed: 101 (61.6%) implanted with the conventional technique (CON) using the three-cusp coplanar view, and 63 (38.4%) using the right and left cusp overlap (COVL) technique. The primary endpoint (PEP) was the need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) at 30 days. Results: Mean age, prevalence of male gender, hypertension, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), and history of stroke, kidney function or hemodialysis was not different between groups. Patients in the COVL group had more diabetes, coronary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and prior infarct, and pre-TAVI PTCA was similar, with higher STS score (6.3±2.2 vs. 5.8±2.4; p=0.05). The presence of atrial fibrillation was greater in the COVL group, without differences in right or left bundle branch or atrioventricular block. There was no difference in aortic valve area, mean gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction. At 30 days, the need of PPM was significantly reduced with the COVL technique (6.3%% vs. 17.8%; p=0.03). No difference was observed in mortality, stroke, major bleeding, acute myocardial infarction or aortic regurgitation, and the presence of new-onset complete left bundle branch block was lower in the COVL group (4.8% vs. 12.9%; p=0.08). Conclusions: Use of the COVL technique, which allows higher self-expandable valve implantation during TAVI, was feasible and safe, decreasing the need for PPM without increasing complications.

Endocarditis infecciosa luego del implante de válvula aórtica por cateterismo / Infective Endocarditis after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

RESUMEN Introducción: La endocarditis infecciosa (EI) post implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica (TAVI) es poco frecuente, con una alta tasa de morbimortalidad. Métodos: Se analizaron 630 pacientes consecutivos con TAVI, de los cuales 6 (0,95%) presentaron EI. Resultados: Cuatro eran hombres, edad 81,3 ± 2,2 años, y todos sintomáticos. La fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda (FEVI) fue 56,8 ± 5,3%. Todos recibieron un implante exitoso y uno presentó regurgitación moderada. Dos requirieron marcapaso definitivo, a uno de ellos se le debió recolocar el cable a las 24 hs. La EI se presentó a los 63,5 ± 73,3 días (mediana de 35 días). El germen aislado fue un coco (+) en cuatro casos. En uno se observó una vegetación en el ecocardiograma transesofágico. Un paciente falleció dentro de los 30 días. El seguimiento fue a 23 ± 22 meses, ningún paciente presentó nuevos eventos o internaciones. En el eco Doppler la FEVI fue de 55,9 ± 4,6%, el gradiente medio 8,2 ± 1,8 mmHg y la velocidad pico de 1,8 ± 0,2 m/seg. Un paciente terminó una regurgitación moderada. Conclusiones: En esta serie de pacientes, la EI post TAVI fue poco frecuente y presentó una evolución favorable con el tratamiento antibiótico.

ABSTRACT Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a rare complication with high morbidity and mortality. Methods: Of 630 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI, 6 (0.95%) presented IE. Results: Four patients were men, mean age was 81.3 ± 2.2 years and all the patients were symptomatic. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56.8 ± 5.3%. The procedure was successful in all the patients and one presented moderate regurgitation. Two patients required definitive pacemaker and the lead had to be reimplanted 24 hours later in 1 patient. Time to IE was 63.5 ± 73.3 days (median 35 days). A Gram-positive coccus was isolated in four cases. One patient presented a vegetation on transesophagic echocardiography. One patient died within 30 days. During follow-up of 23 ± 22 months none of the patients presented new events or hospitalizations. On Doppler echocardiography, LVEF was 55.9 ± 4.6%, mean trans-aortic gradient was 8.2 ± 1.8 mm Hg and peak systolic velocity was 1.8 ± 0.2 m/s. One patient had moderate regurgitation. Conclusions: In this series of patients, IE after TAVI was uncommon and had a favorable course with antibiotic treatment.

Intravascular ultrasound for cardiac allograft vasculopathy detection.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after heart transplantation is a fibro-proliferative process affecting coronary arteries of the graft in up to 46.8% of the cases during the first 10 years post-transplantation. It is one of the main causes of graft loss and death. Due to graft denervation, CAV causing ischemia is usually clinically silent until the disease is far advanced. In this study, we compared coronary angiography with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for CAV detection. OUTCOMES: A total of 114 patients with HTx who underwent coronary angiography and IVUS between March 2018 and March 2019 were included. Mean follow-up was 87 ± 61 month. Lesions documented by coronary angiography were found in only 27 (24%) of the 114 patients. IVUS revealed ISHLT CAV 0 in 87 patients (76.3%); ISHLT CAV1 in 15 (13,1%) and ISHLT CAV2 and CAV3 in 6 patients (5.2%) each. Among 328 IVUS images, maximum intimal thickness (MIT) >0.5 mm was obtained in 60 vessels (52%) with 24 patients having three-vessel and 19 two-vessel involvement. CONCLUSION: As an adjunct to conventional coronary angiography to detect angiographically silent CAV in heart transplant patients, IVUS is a reliable and safe technique with a low complication rate. Large multicenter studies are necessary to confirm these findings and the potential long-term clinical impact of early detection in clinically and angiographically silent phase.

Tratamiento endovascular de aneurismas de aorta con estrategia minimalista / Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Aneurysms with Minimalistic Approach

RESUMEN Introducción: Los aneurismas de aorta siguen siendo una patología frecuente, en especial aquellos localizados en la aorta abdominal. Desde 1990, gracias al avance en los dispositivos y las técnicas endovasculares, la cirugía convencional ha dejado de ser la única opción de tratamiento. Presentamos nuestros resultados en el manejo del aneurisma de aorta con técnica endovascular mínimamente invasiva. Objetivos: Analizar los resultados a 30 días del implante de endoprótesis en la aorta torácica y abdominal con una estrategia mínimamente invasiva. Material y métodos: Entre marzo de 2012 y abril de 2019 se realizaron 395 implantes consecutivos de endoprótesis de aorta; en 264 (67%) de los cuales se utilizó una técnica mínimamente invasiva (MIN-A). De este grupo 240 procedimientos (90,9%) fueron llevados a cabo para reparar la aorta abdominal (EVAR) y 24 (9,1%) la aorta torácica (TEVAR). Resultados: De 264 pacientes se logró éxito técnico (ET) del implante en el 99,6% y éxito clínico (EC) en el 97,7%. La mortalidad a 30 días fue del 1,1% dado por neumonía, insuficiencia cardíaca y EPOC. Ningún paciente presentó IAM, ACV o necesitó de conversión a reparación quirúrgica de urgencia. El tiempo promedio del procedimiento fue de 62 minutos (SD ± 17). Algunos pacientes requirieron conversión a cierre quirúrgico del acceso [20 (7%) durante los primeros 100 casos, y 7 (3%) en los últimos 164 pacientes p = 0,05)]. El sangrado mayor que requirió transfusión fue del 1,1%. El tiempo promedio para la deambulación fue de 18 horas (SD ± 10), que luego de los primeros 100 pacientes disminuyó en forma significativa a 13 horas (SD ± 2,9 p = 0,05). La estadía hospitalaria en promedio fue de 1,4 días (SD ± 1,14) con 5 casos externados el mismo día del procedimiento. Conclusiones: Los procedimientos de reparación endovascular de aneurismas de la aorta con una estrategia miniinvasiva fueron factibles y seguros, ya que permitieron convertir estos procedimientos en abordajes percutáneos, con bajas tasas de complicaciones asociadas al acceso, menor tiempo quirúrgico, rápida deambulación y menor estadía hospitalaria, sin modificar la seguridad global del procedimiento. La curva de aprendizaje permitió bajar la tasa de conversiones a cirugía, así como los tiempos de deambulación.

ABSTRACT Background: Aortic aneurysms, particularly of the abdominal aorta, are still common. Since 1990, conventional surgery is no longer the only treatment option due to advances in endovascular devices and techniques. We present our results in the management of aortic aneurysms with a minimally invasive endovascular technique. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the 30-day outcomes of endograft implantation in the thoracic aorta and abdominal aorta using a minimally invasive approach. Methods: Between March 2012 and April 2019, 395 consecutive endografts were implanted in the aorta, and 264 (67%) were performed using a minimally invasive approach (MIN-A). Among this group, 240 (90.9%) corresponded to abdominal endo-vascular aortic repair (EVAR) and 24 (9.1%) to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Results: Technical success (TS) of the implant was achieved in 99.6% of the 264 patients and clinical success (CS) in 97.7%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% due to pneumonia, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There were no cases of myocardial infarction, stroke or need for conversion to urgent surgical repair. Mean duration of the procedure was 62 minutes (SD ± 17). Some patients required conversion to surgical closure of the access site [20 (7%) during the first 100 cases and 7 (3%) in the final 164 patients, p = 0.05]. Three (1.1%) patients presented major bleeding requiring transfusion. Mean time to ambulation was 18 hours (SD ± 10) that significantly decreased to 13 hours after the first 100 patients (SD ± 2.9; p= 0.05). Mean length of hospital stay was 1.4 days (SD ± 1.14) with 5 patients discharged on the same day of the procedure. Conclusions: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using a minimally invasive strategy was feasible and safe, turning this procedure into a percutaneous approach, with low access site-related complications, shorter operative time, rapid ambulation and shorter length of hospital stay, without modifying overall safety of the procedure. The learning curve resulted in reduced rate of conversion to surgery and earlier ambulation.

Implante percutáneo de la válvula aórtica con estrategia minimalista / Minimalist Approach for Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation

RESUMEN Introducción: El reemplazo de válvula aórtica transcatéter (TAVR) se está convirtiendo en un procedimiento estándar para pacientes con alto riesgo quirúrgico que necesitan el reemplazo de la válvula aórtica. Esta técnica ha evolucionado rápidamente y la llamada estrategia minimalista está ganando adeptos en todo el mundo, mientras la evidencia en su favor todavía se está acumulando. Objetivo: Analizar los resultados a 30 días de la estrategia minimalista (MIN-A) en comparación con la técnica convencional (CON-A) en la experiencia de un solo centro. Material y métodos: Entre septiembre de 2009 y febrero de 2018, se realizaron 303 procedimientos consecutivos de TAVR por acceso femoral, 229 (75,6%) de ellos con MIN-A y 74 (24,4%) con CON-A. Resultados: La edad promedio de los pacientes fue de 79,5 años y ambos grupos tenían características similares. No hubo diferencias entre estos en lo referido a hipertensión, diabetes, tabaquismo, ICP o CRM previa, IAM, EPOC, fibrilación auricular y diálisis. La ATC por etapas antes del TAVR (procedimiento combinado) y la insuficiencia renal (eGFR < 60 ml / min / 1,73 m2) fueron más frecuentes en los sometidos a CON-A. El score del STS fue similar en ambos grupos. El tiempo del procedimiento fue menor en el grupo MIN-A (125 ± 26 vs. 211 ± 48 minutos; p < 0,001), al igual que el tiempo de hospitalización (4,1 vs. 6,3 días; p = 0,01). A los 30 días, no hubo diferencias en la mortalidad (3,9% frente a 1,4%; p = 0,29), IAM, accidente cerebrovascular, hemorragia, transfusión y complicaciones vasculares. Cuatro pacientes tuvieron falla del dispositivo de cierre (1 requirió reparación quirúrgica, 3 requirieron stent cubierto). Las fugas paravalvulares (PVL) moderadas fueron más frecuentes en el grupo CON-A (11,8% vs. 23%; p = 0,01), pero las PVL graves tuvieron similar incidencia (1,3% vs. 2,7%). Conclusión: La estrategia minimalista en el implante percutáneo de la válvula aórtica demostró ser factible y segura; dicha estrategia disminuyó el tiempo del procedimiento y la estadía en el hospital, con similares resultados clínicos que la estrategia convencional a 30 días, pero con mejor confort para el paciente.

ABSTRACT Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is becoming the standard procedure for high-risk patients requiring aortic valve replacement. This technique has evolved rapidly and the so-called minimalist strategy is gaining worldwide attention, while supporting evidence is still being assembled. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare 30-day outcomes of the minimalist approach (MA) versus the standard approach (SA) for TAVI performed in a single center. Methods: Between September 2009 and February 2018, 303 consecutive TAVI procedures were performed, 229 (75.6%) using the MA and 74 (24.4%) with the SA. Results: Mean age was 79.5 years and both groups had similar characteristics. There were no differences in hypertension, diabetes, smoking habits, previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation and dialysis. PCI before TAVI (combined procedure) and kidney failure (eGFR <60 ml / min / 1.73 m2) were more common in the SA group. The STS score was similar in both groups. The total duration of the procedure and in-hospital stay were lower in the MA group (125±26 vs. 211±48 minutes; p <0.001, and 4.1 vs. 6.3 days; p=0.01, respectively). There were no differences in mortality (3.9% vs. 1.4%; p=ns), incidence of AMI, stroke, major bleeding requiring transfusion or vascular complications at 30 days. The closure device failed in four patients (one underwent surgical repair and three required a covered stent). Moderate paravalvular leaks (PVL) were more frequent in the SA group (11.8% vs. 23%; p=0.01) but the incidence of severe PVL was similar (1.3% vs. 2.7%). Conclusion: The MA for TAVI proved to be feasible and safe, reducing the procedure duration and in-hospital stay, with 30-day outcomes similar to those of the SA but providing better comfort for the patient.

Reparación valvular mitral por cateterismo: experiencia inicial con MitraClip® / Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair: Initial Experience with MitraClip™

RESUMEN Objetivos: Reportar y analizar los resultados iniciales de una serie de pacientes con insuficiencia mitral (IM) grave sintomática y alto riesgo para cirugía que recibieron reparación percutánea de la válvula mitral (RPVM) con MitraClip®. Material y métodos: Entre marzo de 2016 y octubre de 2018 recibieron RPVM con MitraClip® en forma consecutiva 12 sujetos con IM grave sintomática, con alto riesgo o contraindicación para cirugía. Se consideró "éxito del implante" (EI) el correcto agarre de las valvas con el clip que dejó una IM residual leve o moderada al finalizar el procedimiento, y "éxito del procedimiento (EP) a 30 días" el EI en ausencia de eventos adversos mayores (MACE), los que incluyeron muerte, infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), accidente cerebrovascular (ACV), necesidad de cirugía valvular, derrame pericárdico, taponamiento o sangrado mayor. Datos basales y antecedentes de los pacientes: la media de edad fue de 74,1 ± 8,9 años; 7 eran hombres; 3, diabéticos; 10 eran hipertensos y dislipidémicos; 4 eran tabaquistas, 5 tenían fibrilación auricular, 2 portaban marcapasos definitivo, 3 documentaban IAM previo, 2 habían sido sometidos antes a ATC y 4 a cirugía cardíaca. La tasa de filtración glomerular estimada (eGFR) fue de 73,8 ± 34,8 ml/m2, 2 tenían < 60 ml/m2 y uno se encontraba en diálisis. Todos los pacientes estaban en clase funcional (CF) III-IV, con antecedentes de internaciones por insuficiencia cardíaca (IC). Características ecográficas: diámetro diastólico del ventrículo izquierdo (DDVI): 61,8 ± 6,4 mm; diámetro sistólico (DSVI): 46,3±2,1 mm; fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI): 47,5±13,4% (rango: 25-60%). La causa de la IM era degenerativa en 7 pacientes y funcional en 5. La evaluación del riesgo mostró un EuroSCORElog de 9,6±6,8; el STS score de mortalidad fue 16,1 ±1 3,5 y el de morbimortalidad 22,8 ± 17,7. Resultados: Se obtuvo EI en todos los pacientes; en 7 enfermos se implantó 1 solo clip y en los otros 5 se colocaron 2 clips; el gradiente residual medio posimplante fue 3,6 ± 0,2 mmHg. La IM posprocedimiento fue leve en 11 y mínima en 1. La estadía hospitalaria media fue de 1,9 ± 0,8 días (rango: 1-3 días). A los 30 días, todos los sujetos se encontraban en CF I-II; ningún paciente presentó eventos mayores o reinternación por IC. El seguimiento abarcó a todos los pacientes y se extendió por un tiempo medio de 8,8 ± 6,7 meses (rango: 1-30 meses). Dos pacientes fallecieron: 1 de neumonía a los 14 meses y otro a los 30 meses por IC refractaria luego de un reemplazo valvular aórtico por cateterismo (TAVI), manteniendo IM leve. No hubo otras complicaciones. Todos se encontraban en CF I-II, 1 requirió reinternación por IC (a los 7 meses). El eco-Doppler cardíaco de seguimiento demostró IM leve en 11 pacientes y moderada a grave en 1. Hubo una mejoría en la calidad de vida en todos los casos. Conclusiones: En esta serie inicial de un solo centro y que incluye la curva de aprendizaje, la RPVM con MitraClip® en pacientes con IM grave sintomática y alto riesgo quirúrgico fue segura y efectiva, con una mejoría clínica significativa y también en la calidad de vida en el seguimiento.

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze and report our initial outcomes of Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair (PMVR) with MitraClip® for patients with severe symptomatic Mitral Regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk. Methods: Between March 2016 and October 2018 twelve consecutive PMVR with MitraClip® were performed in patients with severe symptomatic MR and contraindication or high surgical risk. Implantation Success (IS) was defined as adequate leaflets grasping, leaving < moderate residual MR at the end of the procedure and 30-day Procedural Success when IS was achieved without any Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE: death, AMI, Stroke, need of valvular surgery, pericardial effusion, tamponade or major bleeding). Results: Mean age was 74.1±8.9 years, all of them had hypertension and Dyslipemia 7 were men, 3 diabetics, 4 smokers, 5 had previous atrial fibrillation, 2 permanent pacemakers, 3 previous AMI, 2 of them had received PCI and 4 cardiac surgery. The eGFR was 73.8±34.8 ml/m2, 2 had <60 ml/m2 and one on dialysis. All Ptes were in FC III-IV and history of previous hospitalizations because heart failure. Echocardiographic findings: Left Ventricle End Diastolic Diameter (LVEDD) 61.8±6.4, End Systolic Diameter (LVESD) 46.3±2.1; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 47.5±13.4 (25-60). MI were degenerative in 7 Ptes and functional in 5. Risk Scores: EuroSCORE log was 9.6±6.8, STS for mortality 16.1±13.5 and the STS for morbimortality of 22.8±17.7 EI was achieved in all Ptes; 1 Single Clip was implanted in 7 Pts and 2 Clips in 5; Mean residual post-implantation gradient was 3.6±0.2 mmHg. IS was achieved in all; post-procedural MR was mild in 11 and trivial in one. Mean length of hospital stay was 1.9±0.8 (1-3) days. At 30 days all were in FC 0-II, no one presented MACE or rehospitalization because heart failure. Follow-Up was performed in all Ptes with an average time of 8.8±6.7 (1-30) months. Two patients died (1 from pneumonia at 14 months and another at 30 months due to refractory cardiac failure after TAVI, maintaining mild MR.) There were no other complications, all were in FC I-II, one required rehospitalization due to heart failure (at 7 month). Echo Doppler at follow-Up showed that 11 Ptes had <2 MR and 1 had >2 MR. The QOL improved during the follow-up Conclusion: In this initial series, from a single center that includes the learning curve of the team, PMVR with MitraClip® in Ptes with severe mitral regurgitation and high surgical risk was safe and effective, with a significant clinical improvement at follow-up

Percutaneous repair of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) represents a viable therapeutic option in patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. The development of a left ventricular pseudoaneurysm (LVP) represents an infrequent but potentially catastrophic complication after transapical TAVR. In this case report, we present a patient undergoing TAVR through subclavian access which had an LVP and underwent successful percutaneous closure.

Transradial Versus Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting: A 16-Year Single-Center Experience.

AIMS: Limited data exist on radial access in carotid artery stenting (CAS). This single-center study was performed to compare the outcome and complication rates of transradial (TR) and transfemoral (TF) CAS. METHODS AND RESULTS: The clinical and angiographic data of 775 consecutive patients with high risk for carotid endarterectomy, treated between 1999 and 2016 by CAS with cerebral protection, were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to vascular access: TR (n = 101; 13%) and TF (n = 674). Primary combined end-point: in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebral events. Secondary end-points: angiographic outcome of the procedure and crossover rate to another puncture site. Angiographic success was achieved in all 775 patients, the crossover rate was 4.9% in the TR and 0% in the TF group (P < 0.05). TR was performed at the right side in 97% of cases. The incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebral events was 2% in the TR and 3.6% in the TF group (P = ns). CONCLUSIONS: The TR approach for CAS is safe and efficacious, with acceptable cross-over rate. In both groups, vascular complications rarely occurred.

Hybrid strategy for unstable patients with severe carotid and cardiac disease requiring surgery.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent severe carotid and cardiac disease is a challenging situation where staged surgery is probably the most common strategy. However, in patients with an unstable clinical presentation, the best approach is still a matter of debate. The aim of the study was to report in-hospital and midterm outcome in patients who received carotid artery stenting and synchronous cardiac surgery. METHODS: From June 1998 to July 2012, 54 consecutive patients who were treated at a high-volume university medical center with this hybrid approach were included in the study. All of the patients received carotid angioplasty while being administered aspirin and regular unfractionated heparin. Then, all of the patients were immediately transferred to the operating room for coronary and/or cardiac valve surgery. All of the patients were administered aspirin and clopidogrel once bleeding was ruled out, after surgery. RESULTS: There were 5 in-hospital surgical related deaths, and no patient suffered a stroke or required carotid urgent re-intervention. At follow-up (55 ± 28 months; range 1-144 months), there were no new neurological deficits, while one additional death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, synchronous carotid stenting and cardiac surgery were feasible with an acceptable complication rate in a high-surgical-risk population, which could not undergo staged procedures.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation without balloon predilation: a single-center pilot experience.

AIM: To assess the results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), without balloon predilation, in high-risk patients with degenerated severe aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-one consecutive patients who underwent direct TAVI, 98% through a transfemoral approach. Patients were 79 ± 8 years of age, 74% in New York Heart Association classes III or IV and at high risk for surgical valve replacement (mean logistic EuroScore 20 ± 15). Mean aortic valve area was 0.7 ± 0.2 cm(2). Procedural success rate was 94.2%. In-hospital, there were 2 deaths, 1 minor stroke with minimal sequelae, and 14 (28%) pacemaker implantation. At 30 days, there was one additional stroke and no new deaths. The mean postprocedural transprosthetic gradient was 15 ± 5 mm Hg; periprosthetic severe regurgitation was absent and moderate in one case. After a median follow-up of 7 months, there were five additional deaths (two cardiac), while 84% of survivors were in New York Heart Association classes I or II. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that direct CoreValve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis is feasible and may lead to hemodynamic and clinical improvement in patients who are poor candidates for aortic valve surgery, pending confirmation in larger series with longer follow-up.

Beneficios y complicaciones del implante directo de prótesis aórtica autoexpandible para el tratamiento de la estenosisvalvular aórtica grave / Outcomes of Direct Implantation of Self-Expandable Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Severe Aortic Stenosis / Outcomes of Direct Implantation of Self-Expandable Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Severe Aortic Stenosis

Objetivo Describir la experiencia inicial con el implante directo de la prótesis aórtica autoexpandible CoreValve® en un centro argentino de alta complejidad cardiovascular. Material y métodos Desde mayo a diciembre de 2010 se incluyeron en forma consecutiva pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave (EAG) de alto riesgo sometidos a implante directo de prótesis CoreValve® (n = 21). Los criterios de inclusión fueron: área de la válvula aórtica < 1 cm2 (< 0,6 cm2/m2), anillo valvular aórtico de entre 20 y 27 mm, diámetro de la aorta ascendente a nivel de la unión sinotubular ≤ 40 (prótesis pequeña) o ≤ 43 mm (prótesis grande) y diámetro de la arteria femoral > 6 mm. Resultados La edad fue de 79 ± 8 años, el área valvular aórtica fue de 0,7 ± 0,2 cm2 y el EuroSCORE logístico fue del 26% ± 15% (50% con EuroSCORE logístico ≥ 20%). Tras el implante, el gradiente transaórtico máximo por ecocardiograma descendió de 80 ± 22 mm Hg a 14 ± 5 mm Hg. Dos pacientes presentaron insuficiencia aórtica de grado grave, que mejoraron luego de la posdilatación. La tasa de éxito del procedimiento fue del 95%, ya que un paciente falleció luego del implante valvular. Se implantó un marcapasos definitivo por bloqueo auriculoventricular en 6 pacientes. La sobrevida acumulada (media de seguimiento 5 ± 2,8 meses) fue del 75%. Conclusión Nuestra experiencia inicial sugiere que el implante directo de la prótesis CoreValve® es una opción terapéutica segura y factible para los pacientes con EAG de alto riesgo quirúrgico.

Objective To describe the initial experience with aortic valve implantation via a direct approach using a self-expanding CoreValveTM aortic valve prosthesis in a tertiary care center from Argentina. Material and methods From May to December 2010, 21 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS) and high surgical risk undergoing percutaneous aortic valve replacement with CoreValveTM prosthesis were included. The inclusion criteria were the following: aortic valve area <1 cm2 (<0.6 cm2/m2); aortic annulus diameter of 20-27 mm; diameter of the ascending aorta at the level of the sinotubular junction ≤ 40 (small prosthesis) or ≤ 43 mm (large prosthesis), and femoral artery diameter >6 mm. Results Mean age was 79±8 years, mean aortic valve area was 0.7±0.2 cm2 and mean logistic EuroSCORE was 26±15% (50% with logistic EuroSCORE ³ 20%). After valve implantation, peak transaortic pressure gradient measured by echocardiography decreased from 80±22 to 14±5 mm Hg. Two patients developed severe aortic regurgitation which improved with post-dilation. The success rate of the procedure was of 95% as a patient died immediately after valve implant. A definite pacemaker was implanted to six patients due to atrioventricular block. Cumulative survival was 75% after a mean follow-up of 5±2.8 months. Conclusion Our initial experience suggests that direct implantation of CoreValveTM prosthesis is a safe and feasible therapeutic option for patients with SAS and high surgical risk.

Beneficios y complicaciones del implante directo de prótesis aórtica autoexpandible para el tratamiento de la estenosisvalvular aórtica grave / Outcomes of Direct Implantation of Self-Expandable Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Severe Aortic Stenosis / Outcomes of Direct Implantation of Self-Expandable Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Severe Aortic Stenosis

Objetivo Describir la experiencia inicial con el implante directo de la prótesis aórtica autoexpandible CoreValve« en un centro argentino de alta complejidad cardiovascular. Material y métodos Desde mayo a diciembre de 2010 se incluyeron en forma consecutiva pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave (EAG) de alto riesgo sometidos a implante directo de prótesis CoreValve« (n = 21). Los criterios de inclusión fueron: área de la válvula aórtica < 1 cm2 (< 0,6 cm2/m2), anillo valvular aórtico de entre 20 y 27 mm, diámetro de la aorta ascendente a nivel de la unión sinotubular ≤ 40 (prótesis pequeña) o ≤ 43 mm (prótesis grande) y diámetro de la arteria femoral > 6 mm. Resultados La edad fue de 79 ± 8 años, el área valvular aórtica fue de 0,7 ± 0,2 cm2 y el EuroSCORE logístico fue del 26% ± 15% (50% con EuroSCORE logístico ≥ 20%). Tras el implante, el gradiente transaórtico máximo por ecocardiograma descendió de 80 ± 22 mm Hg a 14 ± 5 mm Hg. Dos pacientes presentaron insuficiencia aórtica de grado grave, que mejoraron luego de la posdilatación. La tasa de éxito del procedimiento fue del 95%, ya que un paciente falleció luego del implante valvular. Se implantó un marcapasos definitivo por bloqueo auriculoventricular en 6 pacientes. La sobrevida acumulada (media de seguimiento 5 ± 2,8 meses) fue del 75%. Conclusión Nuestra experiencia inicial sugiere que el implante directo de la prótesis CoreValve« es una opción terapéutica segura y factible para los pacientes con EAG de alto riesgo quirúrgico.(AU)

Objective To describe the initial experience with aortic valve implantation via a direct approach using a self-expanding CoreValveTM aortic valve prosthesis in a tertiary care center from Argentina. Material and methods From May to December 2010, 21 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS) and high surgical risk undergoing percutaneous aortic valve replacement with CoreValveTM prosthesis were included. The inclusion criteria were the following: aortic valve area <1 cm2 (<0.6 cm2/m2); aortic annulus diameter of 20-27 mm; diameter of the ascending aorta at the level of the sinotubular junction ≤ 40 (small prosthesis) or ≤ 43 mm (large prosthesis), and femoral artery diameter >6 mm. Results Mean age was 79±8 years, mean aortic valve area was 0.7±0.2 cm2 and mean logistic EuroSCORE was 26±15% (50% with logistic EuroSCORE ³ 20%). After valve implantation, peak transaortic pressure gradient measured by echocardiography decreased from 80±22 to 14±5 mm Hg. Two patients developed severe aortic regurgitation which improved with post-dilation. The success rate of the procedure was of 95% as a patient died immediately after valve implant. A definite pacemaker was implanted to six patients due to atrioventricular block. Cumulative survival was 75% after a mean follow-up of 5±2.8 months. Conclusion Our initial experience suggests that direct implantation of CoreValveTM prosthesis is a safe and feasible therapeutic option for patients with SAS and high surgical risk.(AU)

Clinical outcome after saphenous vein stenting with Taxus Liberté stent: results from the OLYMPIA Registry (TAXUS Liberté Postapproval Global Program).

We evaluated the incidence of clinical events after implantation of the TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent in saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions in an unselected patient population. The OLYMPIA (TAXUS Liberté Post-Approval Global Registry) program gathered data on 21 954 patients receiving at least 1 TAXUS Liberté stent, including 345 patients with SVG lesions. All cardiac events were monitored with independent adjudication of end points. Patients enrolled at procedure started with no mandated inclusion/exclusion criteria. In SVG-OLYMPIA (n = 345), baseline comorbidities/complex disease were more frequent than the rest of the OLYMPIA (n = 21 560). SVG-OLYMPIA had similar cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, and definitive stent thrombosis rates than the rest of OLYMPIA. Despite higher baseline risk, the SVG-OLYMPIA had similar 12-month clinical outcome than the rest of the OLYMPIA registry, confirming the safety and efficacy of the TAXUS Liberté stent in this high-risk group.